Short Selling Perils
By S.P. Brown
Lately, many investors have turned decidedly bearish, which is
understandable. After all, most market indices are now trading
deeply in the red.
Leading this bloodletting has been the tech-heavy Nasdaq
Composite Index (COMPX), which is trading off 32 percent from
its all-time high of 5,028 set back on March 10.
Now, many former bulls are looking to make money on the
downward momentum.
One of the simplest techniques to make a buck in a falling
market is short selling. In a short sale, a stock is borrowed
from a broker and then sold, creating a short position. Then,
the position is reversed, or covered, when the stock is
repurchased to repay the loan. The short seller profits if
he's able to repurchase stock at a lower price than he received
in creating the short position.
There are a few rules investors need to know about short
selling. One, a stock can only be shorted on an up-tick. For
example, a stock can be sold short at $51 1/8 if the
transaction just before was at $51.
Investors also need to be aware of capital requirements, a
point often misunderstood by tyro investors. Many people
believe that since a short transaction starts with a sale,
there is no need to put up any money or collateral. This
simply is not true.
The investment necessary to execute a short sale is defined by
an initial margin requirement that designates the amount of
cash (or equity) the investor must deposit with his broker,
which is currently 50 percent for equities. Thus, if an
investor wishes to short $10,000 worth of stock, he must
deposit $5,000 with his broker.
Unlike a long margined investor, a short margined investor does
not pay interest on his borrowings, since he did not borrow
cash, he borrowed securities. Still, he is responsible for
paying any dividends that come due during the time his position
is open.
Shorting can be a nifty device for protecting a gain in a long
position. For example, if an investor owns a stock with a cost
basis of $25 a share and it rises to $100, he can safely lock
in his $75 gain by shorting the stock at $100.
However, most investors use shorting to speculate on a stock's
decline, which is far from a riskless activity. If an investor
were to short a $100 stock, the most he could gain is $100. On
the other hand, his loss exposure is unlimited; theoretically,
a stock can rise to infinity. Unlimited loss potential is what
makes shorting individual stocks risky business.
Pragmatically speaking, though, a loss of infinity isn't going
to happen. But huge losses can incur - and can incur
shockingly fast - when a short investor gets caught in a short
squeeze.
A short squeeze occurs when the price of a stock moves up
sharply and investors with short positions are forced to buy
the stock in order to cover their losses. This sudden surge of
buying leads to even higher prices, further aggravating the
losses of those short sellers who have not covered their
positions.
The most famous short squeeze occurred in 1978 when legendary
short seller Robert Wilson publicly announced (a big mistake)
he had shorted 200,000 shares of Resorts International, which
had just opened the first gaming casino in Atlantic City.
Wilson reasoned that Resorts would not do well since Atlantic
City's weather is not as favorable as that in Las Vegas.
What's more, he believed that casinos needed Mafia muscle to
collect debts, which Atlantic City had all but eliminated.
Wilson was betting that investor interest in Resorts would be
tepid at best.
He couldn't have been more wrong. Investors fell in love with
the casino. Soon after Wilson opened his position, Resorts
quickly moved to $20. From there, it was straight up to $40,
to $50, and then to $60 - all within a matter of weeks.
Now, the squeeze was really on as investors knew there was
pent up demand for Resorts' stock because of Wilson's 200,000
short position. Many on Wall Street took perverse pleasure in
pushing the casino's stock higher.
Finally, by early September, Resorts was trading at $190,
meaning Wilson was in the hole $35 million, which is where he
eventually covered.
The moral of this fable is that investors considering shorting
this market would be well advised not to put all their eggs in
one basket. To be safe, an investor should spread his shorts
over a minimum of 10 different stocks, or short a market
index, such as one of the many that trade on the American Stock
Exchange.
As Robert Wilson has proven, even the most-savvy short seller
can lose it all when just one sale goes against him.